|
Now, with the Spring ratings period just ahead,
this is a great time to review your music
scheduling software. European music consultant,
Robert Johansson from Better Radio
Programming, is a music software ace and helps
stations
throughout Europe optimize their music
programming. Today, Robert shares 10 of the most
common music scheduling problems.
| Beyond the function keys... |
 |
1) Mismatch between music library and music
strategy: Very simply, are you playing the
right songs? The right strategy and the wrong
songs will not help you achieve your goals.
Review each song in rotation and determine how
it contributes to the strategy, then recode the
library, and run the analysis tools to check
against your desired goal.
2) Mathematical rotations: Proper
turnover ratios are critical to the efficient
scheduling of your categories. The wrong
turnover will make it more difficult to schedule
songs, or even worse, songs will play in the
same daypart or hour day after day. Avoid having
the same or similar turnover for multiple
categories or your rotation patterns will become
predicable. For instance: a 6 song category
played 1 time every hour will naturally be
played every 6 hours, with a risk of having the
song play at 0600, 1200, 1800 & 2400 every day.
3) Consistent coding: In so many cases,
stations have multiple people entering the songs
and determining the sound coding. When a
computer receives inconsistent parameters and
values, the result will probably be the same.
Review the coding of your entire library at
least once a year, and more often on
contemporary based station. And this must be
done by one person or small group all at once.
The best way to do this is to set up a list of
typical songs that describe each code used by
the station and use this as a guide.
4) Rules and parameters: Rethink which
rules really matter to your station. Prioritize
and don't use more rules than needed. The rules
used must be in sync with the coding of the
library. Watch out which rules are breakable
and which are unbreakable. Too many unbreakable
rules will give you a false sense of security,
while really working against the natural flow of
your station. One typical problem is "Artist
Separation". A separation of 2½ hours with a
category turning over in 5 hours will keep other
songs by that same artist from ever playing. If
variety is your claim, make sure to have rules
which deal with type, style, era and tempo
activated and leave others turned off.
See emotional responses to your music... »
|
| What does your music say about your station? |
 |
5) Build clocks that communicate what's
really important for the station: To satisfy
the listeners you need to create clocks that
make sure you're never far away from the songs
that are most important for your listeners. If
you are playing "spice" songs or new unfamiliar
music, play them between your truly strong
songs. For instance; if you're a CHR station
make sure to play your new cuts next to your
"important songs" like Power currents or Power
recurrents.
6) Use multiple clocks to avoid having songs
play in the same clock position every time it
gets played: With a better match between the
number of songs in each category and the number
of different clocks, there can be a flow where
the songs get exposed in different positions
within the hour. With a setup of 5, 7 and 9
currents you can be very successful with 4
different sets of music sweeps where these
current songs can appear in both first, second,
third and fourth quarter hour.
7) Sound code/Type/Category Balance: Poor
balance can make a station sound inconsistent.
Five songs from type A in 1 hour and none in the
next hour can communicate two different types of
stations. An even exposure of all your played
sounds is the way to go. This is especially
important for your edgier sounds. The solution
is primarily in category setup and secondarily
in your rules settings. By making sure to set up
rules for your truly "edgy" sounds, you can
control their distribution more easily. With too
many rules for core sounds, you will
unnecessarily make it harder for your music
scheduler to work well.
8) Inconsistent categories: I believe
that each category must communicate one general
theme. In many databases I review, I see big
problems with categories communicating too many
things. In this case, the station is less
likely to deliver the balance that they strive
to achieve in each quarter hour. A power
category with too many songs, for instance,
risks not being able to communicate passion. Are
all songs in the category really Power songs? If
a category consists of both very new songs and
former power songs it is performing two
different functions for the listener. Depending
on the way these songs fall, the balance from
hour to hour can be uneven when it comes to
familiarity and strength.
Are you satisfying your P1's? They will tell you... »
|
| Exposing the right songs |
 |
9) Uneven Exposure: Poorly designed
categories and clocks often result in some songs
in a category receiving a lot of exposure, while
others in the same category receive very little.
If an average secondary song receives more
airplay than many powers because the computer
finds it easier to schedule, you need to either
fix the categories or the rule settings. This
also happens more often if you experience too
many unscheduled positions.
10) Vertical and Horizontal Separation:
Many stations make an effort to use rules to
keep titles well separated. If a category is
out of balance, and the rules are too strict,
you can end up scheduling the same songs at the
same time day after day or every second or third
day. The scheduling software can not perform
miracles, if the natural rotation of a category
is 2 days even, there is only so much it can do
to correct this problem. If your rules are too
rigorous (and without a clear hierarchy) the
scheduler must compromise somewhere to the
detriment of your strategy and your TSL.
Rethink how listeners are using the station; If
the average midday listener is not listening in
the evening, then a 1day/1 daypart separation is
more effective than a 2 day rotation for your
station.
Knowledge and solutions here... »
|
| About Robert Johansson |
 |
Robert Johansson / Better Radio
Programming is a
music programming consultant specializing in
optimizing and creation of music databases.
Better Radio Programming provides services for
all major software such as Selector V12 and XV,
PowerGold and MusicMaster
Robert has more than 12 years experience working
with RCS and has more than 16 years experience
working with radio. Better Radio has worked for
both public and private radiostations throughout
Europe.
Robert
Johansson
Better Radio Programming AB
http://www.betterradio.se
robert@betterradio.se
Better Radio Programming AB »
|
|
| OnlineTRACKER works! |
|

"OnlineTRACKER accurately predicts the hits
quicker with much larger samples, preventing the
'bounce around' which means you can discard the
'stiffs' quicker. It's amazingly accurate when
compared to traditional 'passive callout'
probably to within the 95% range."
--Jeff Ballentine, Program Director
WBNS/Columbus
TeamPINNACLE:
President / CEO: Bob
Lawrence
VP/International: Ken
Benson
VP/Internet Services: Mark
Carlson
Director of Research International: Reini Mika
Steiner
Director of Research: Dan
Cowen
Senior Associate: Dan
Binder
Director of Operations/Field Management: Lisa
Amman
Client Services Manager: Kelley
Mack
Project Coordinator: Heather Owens
Contact us:
Pinnacle Media Worldwide
931 S Mission Road
Fallbrook CA 92028
+1.760.731.1141
Try OnlineTRACKER at your station free for 90-days!
|
|